I took a lot of time in creating my research because I knew that they would help to inspire my own ideas and would give me crucial ideas and conventions of real music magazines. I decided to focus the bulk of my research on NME and Q as I have taken a liking to their styles when looking for pages to annotate as part of my research. Although I have also chosen to annotate Vibe, Kerrang and Clash because I thought they have some stylistic features that I like. As I said NME and Q are the main conventions that can be seen in the production of my work.
I chose to follow the conventions of many music magazines as I decided in the end to add a masthead, this makes the title stand out as it dominates the page. This also makes the title and the genre obvious to the reader. I wanted it to obviously be a music magazine and had so I called my magazine 'Music Scene' a name with musical connotations. I also chose to add date, issue number and the barcode as these are all conventions that existing music magazines choose to use. They are good as they allow the audience to organise a collection by date. I felt that it would be good for me to use a barcode as it allowed me to show that I could weave it in to the page without it gaining too much attention.



The research had also told me that it was important to add in a competition, all of the other magazines that I have looked have offered the chance to win a competition. I think they are good as they offer an incentives for the audience to pick up and read the magazine if they aren't particularly interested in the main articles.
Another convention that I chose to follow was the limited use of block colour. From looking at existing music magazines I noticed that most of them used block colour but only usually once. They do this to make one certain feature of the page stand out, it does this as the one block colour attracts the audiences eye compared to the rest of the page. I thought this was a good idea so I decided to use this convention, I put the competition in this box as I feel it is the part of my front cover that I think will interest the audience most and I am relying on it help sell copies. Following this convention led me to just put my text on top of the actual picture, I feel this is more effective as too many block colours make the page look too busy.
The final little convention I followed is to do with my main photo, from looking at 'Clash' 'Kerrang' and others I noticed that all of the models on the front covers were looking straight at the camera. I decided this was a good convention to follow as this gives the a connection with the audience.
However I did chose to challenge some conventions I have spotted. Clash in particular uses a lot of pull quotes form the articles on the front cover. I felt that this wasn't really a convention I would want to follow. I think that the cover should be reserved for only the articles inside, if a person isn't particularly interested in the pull quote or the pull quote offends them in any way they are unlikely to buy the magazine. I also felt that there was no room for one. I couldn't really put it along the bottom as that would only leave me with two articles which isn't enough and I couldn't put it at the side because it would look out of place on it's own.
In terms of the contents page I chose to use a single page contents page. Out of the 5 magazines that I looked at only 1 of them chose to a double page. I felt that I could fit in everything that I wanted to say into one page. Doing it this way would make my page look more organised, where as a double page would mean the articles would have to be spread out and this would make them hard to find.
The main way in which my research helped me was with the structure. I was planning to order the articles in number order e.g.1,2,3,4 etc but none of the magazines I researched did it this way. They all structured them under headings such as 'News' and 'Features.' I felt this was a good idea as it makes the page easier to search for the reader plus it gave my page a professional look.
The final convention I used on my contents page was the descriptions under the articles. I didn't realise this was a convention as in all the magazines I read (which aren't music related) didn't do this. I came round to the idea because if the description was done correctly with the use of questions it could entice the reader to read on more than a single sub heading.
The only real convention I chose to challenge is the use of the subscribe to us box. About half of the magazines I looked at was had this feature where details on how to subscribe to the magazine were given. I felt that this wasn't necessary needed on the contents page as it could be a stand alone advertisement later in the magazine. This will make it much more noticeable than a little box in the corner. I also feel that the without the box I will have more space to inform the audience of what is inside the magazine.
I chose to follow the quite basic conventions for my double page spread of adding in page numbers, this is needed to help the audience as without them there would be no point of the contents page as they correspond. I also chose to add my logo to the top left corner, I feel that this adds to brand identity and really makes it clear who is producing the magazine with the hope the audience will remember the name more.
I actually had to refer back to my research as I wasn't sure if I had accurately followed the convention regarding the main text for my article. it turned out that my text was too big it was size 16 when most music magazines use a font similar to size 10. Having a large font wasn't really working as it only meant that I could have a small article. This in fact reflected badly on the impression as it looks like I couldn't find much to talk about and gave the impression there wasn't much worth reading in the article.
Although I chose not to use a pull quote on my front cover I chose to use one on my double page spread. Most of the double page spreads I analysed did this especially NME. I felt this is good as it can give a good overview of the article content without reading it. I also feel that it is helps to break up what would otherwise be large chunks of text.
The only convention I decided to challenge was the amount of pictures that I chose to use the average number I noticed during research was 2. Although an issue like this depends on the content and style of the article as mine is an article of the band and then band profiles not including pictures of the band members would be rather inappropriate. There is one article that I analysed that I liked and it is in NME, as I like the way the text and the band profiles was laid out I chose to
use it as my inspiration and that used 4 pictures just like mine.